<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looks like I have the wrong bumpers!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barrysjags.com/2006/08/looks-like-i-have-the-wrong-bumpers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barrysjags.com/2006/08/looks-like-i-have-the-wrong-bumpers/</link>
	<description>A confessed Jaguar Nut attempts to bring to cars back to life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:04:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://barrysjags.com/2006/08/looks-like-i-have-the-wrong-bumpers/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barrysjags.com/2006/08/09/looks-like-i-have-the-wrong-bumpers/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>the 240 and 340 came with the same bumpers as the S type (1963-1968)  and the 420, (1966-1968),  i.e., the &quot;refined&quot; thin bumpers.

The MK-II &quot;thick&quot; bumpers were only used in the MK-II and the 3.4 Saloon aka the MK-I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 240 and 340 came with the same bumpers as the S type (1963-1968)  and the 420, (1966-1968),  i.e., the &#8220;refined&#8221; thin bumpers.</p>
<p>The MK-II &#8220;thick&#8221; bumpers were only used in the MK-II and the 3.4 Saloon aka the MK-I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

